The breakthrough occurred with the completion of the first
stage of the human genome project. This master blueprint of the human body
promises future medical miracles involving gene therapy—all in the name of
improving the race.
Two thousand years ago, another “ improvement ” was proposed, not for the good
of the body but of the soul. The monumental implications of this plan would have
borne eternal consequences for all mankind. The proposal stated that Gentiles
had to submit to the Mosaic Law when they placed their faith in Jesus as
Messiah. Was this position true to the original message from God
Paul answers this question in the book of Galatians. Paul had proclaimed the “
good news ” (the gospel) to Gentiles living in the Roman province of Galatia
(modern south-central Turkey [ Acts 13–14 ]), and many there believed in the
Lord Jesus as their Messiah. But after he left Galatia, Jewish teachers visited
these new believers and convinced them to submit to the Mosaic Law in the Old
Testament, saying if Gentiles wanted to be the people of God, they had to become
like Jews. When Paul heard this teaching, he burned with righteous anger. He
wrote the Galatian churches and boldly defended his message by stating four
truths about the gospel he preached.
The Gospel Is Fixed Forever ( Gal. 1:6–10 )
Instead of commending the churches, Paul attacked. His language is stern and his
tone severe:
I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of
Christ unto another gospel (v. 6 ).
The Gentile believers had not merely embraced a new teaching; they had actually
deserted the very God of heaven! Using two different Greek words, Paul describes
their spiritual defection to “ another [heteros, another of a different kind]
gospel, Which is not another [allos, another of the same kind] ” (vv. 6–7
). These two words clarify a fundamental truth: There is only one true gospel.
Any other gospel is false—a counterfeit created by “ some that trouble you, and
would pervert the gospel of Christ ” (v. 7 ). These teachers, known as
Judaizers, bound the Mosaic Law to the Galatian Christians. In effect, they
added works to the gospel of faith.
This perversion provoked Paul ’s harshest condemnation (repeated again in verse
9 ). Anyone, whether an angel from heaven or Paul himself, who preaches a
different gospel than Paul preached is to “ be accursed ” (v. 8 ). Anyone
teaching a false gospel is anathema, cursed to eternal condemnation from God.
Aware of the severity of his message, the apostle confesses that he is not
interested in being popular. His sole motive is to please God rather than men, “
For if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ ” (v. 10
). Faithfulness to the Christian gospel, not flexibility, is what counts. Time
and technology may improve the quality of life over the centuries, but men must
not tamper with the message of eternal salvation. Additions, deletions, or
revisions all spell disaster and invite eternal damnation.
The Gospel Is Revealed by God ( Gal. 1:11–24 )
To some people, Paul might seem proud. After all, who was Paul to think that he
alone, not these teachers from Jerusalem, had the true gospel Paul
addresses this issue by verifying his authority. He clearly states that the
gospel he preached was not of human origin. “ For I neither received it of man,
neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ ” (v. 12 ).
In Judaism, teachers handed down traditions received from others. Paul, the
Jewish apostle, stated that Jesus revealed Himself to him and became his
teacher. His gospel came directly from Jesus Himself.
First, Paul explains his life before his conversion. He was violently
persecuting the new Christian church while, at the same time, surpassing his
contemporaries in observing Judaism, “ being more exceedingly zealous of the
traditions of my fathers ” (v. 14 ). He knew the religion well, including
the oral law. But something radically changed this zealous young man.
Second, Paul describes his conversion in a way that puts himself in the
background. It all began with God who was “ pleased … To reveal his Son ” in him
(vv. 15–16 ) and who had chosen him before his birth, just as He had the
great prophets Isaiah ( Isa. 49:1 ) and Jeremiah ( Jer. 1:5 ). Paul received
this divine call so he might preach the gospel to the Gentiles (see Acts
9:1–15 ). Both his conversion and his call were the supernatural acts of a
sovereign God.
Third, he explains what happened after his conversion. Rather than being trained
by others in Jerusalem, Paul spent three years in Arabia and Damascus (v.
17 ), far from the apostles in Jerusalem and apart from their influence. Paul ’s
gospel and theology came straight from heaven as the divine Teacher instructed
His new apostle. Only after those three years did he finally go to Jerusalem (v.
18 ; cf. Acts 9:26–30 ). There he stayed with Peter fifteen days and saw
James, the half-brother of Jesus. After that brief visit, he went to Syria with
its large city, Antioch, and to his hometown of Tarsus in Cilicia (vv.
19–21 ). The churches in Judea knew about Paul only by his reputation, and they
rejoiced when they heard reports about his conversion and preaching (vv.
22–24 ). Thus the Jerusalem leadership made no impact on Paul ’s formative years
as a believer. He had learned from Christ Himself.
The Gospel Is By Faith Alone ( Gal. 2:1–10 )
In the previous verses, Paul distanced himself from the apostles and
demonstrated his independence from them. Now, however, he shows his equality
with them. He explains a trip he made with Barnabas to Jerusalem fourteen years
after his conversion. While some think this section refers to the Jerusalem
Council ( Acts 15 ), it may be better to view it as Paul ’s trip to bring
financial help to the Jerusalem church during a severe famine ( Acts 11 ).
Paul made this trip “ by revelation ” from God, perhaps via Agabus ’s prophecy (
Acts 11:28 ). Thus he again emphasizes that he was led by God alone rather than
by the leaders of the Jerusalem church (v. 2 ). He had met privately with
these men and explained his mission to the Gentiles. As a test case, Paul had
brought along Titus, a Gentile convert. Would the leaders in Jerusalem demand
that Titus be circumcised, or would they accept him as a true brother in the
faith
Paul indicates that some argued strongly that Titus must be circumcised. These
were “ false brethren, ” he says, who desired to “ bring us into bondage ” (v.
4 ). They claimed that keeping the Mosaic Law, including circumcision, was a
necessary part of the faith, even for Gentile converts. These false teachers
refused to give up the Mosaic shadows despite their faith in Jesus. Here Paul
stood firm and refused to submit to such teaching, “ no, not for an hour, that
the truth of the gospel might continue with you ” (v. 5 ).
The apostolic leaders in Jerusalem (James, Peter, and John) agreed with Paul and
recognized him as an equal by giving him and Barnabas “ the right hands of
fellowship ” (v. 9 ). The apostle to the Gentiles did not submit to the
Jerusalem apostles as an inferior. They recognized that God had called Paul
independently of them. The leadership of the body of Christ agreed that
salvation came by faith alone.
The Gospel Is Apart From the Law ( Gal. 2:11–21 )
Paul next relates an episode of inconsistency by an apostle from Jerusalem.
Peter had traveled north to visit believers in Antioch and had enjoyed
fellowship with Gentile Christians at meals. Since Peter was the first to learn
about the new unity of Jew and Gentile in Christ ( Acts 10 ), it was not
surprising to see him live in a way that demonstrated it. What surprised Paul
was how Peter suddenly broke fellowship with the Gentiles when some men from
Jerusalem, the “ circumcision ” group, came to Antioch (v. 12 ). They
demanded believers shun the new converts who refused to keep the Mosaic Law.
Both Peter and Barnabas succumbed to the pressure from the Judaizers. Such
hypocrisy was too much for Paul. He publicly opposed their inconsistent and
contradictory behavior. A vital principle was at stake.
Paul ’s harsh rebuke, (vv. 14–21 ) begins with a pointed censure of Peter:
If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the
Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews (v. 14
).
Peter lived like a Gentile, yet pressured Gentiles to live like Jews. What
hypocrisy! Paul continues to rebuke Peter and those like-minded in unmistakable
language:
… a man is not justified by the works of the law, … for by the works of the
law shall no flesh be justified (v. 16 ).
No one can ever be declared righteous (“ justified ”) by works. Only faith in
Jesus Christ brings God ’s favor. This teaching did not originate with Paul, as
he later explains to Roman believers; Abraham, too, was justified by faith (
Rom. 4:1–3 ; Gen. 15:6 ).
Not only does the Law not save, but the Law no longer binds those who experience
salvation (vv. 17–18 ). The old era has passed away now that Messiah has
come. Paul is now “ dead to the law ” (v. 19 ). This death for Paul, and
for every believer, comes because of Jesus ’ death and our union with Him. “ I
am crucified with Christ:
nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me ” (v. 20 ). In a
mysterious way, our Messiah now lives within His people, giving them new life
and power to “ live unto God ” in obeying His will (v. 19 ). This new life
does not bow to the domination of the Mosaic Law but walks “ by the faith of the
Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me ” (v. 20 ).
Paul concludes his rebuke by stating that his gospel does “ not make void the
grace of God ” (v. 21 ). The Judaizers contradicted God ’s grace by adding
human merit to faith. In fact, the death of Christ would be useless if we could
achieve God ’s favor by works, “ for if righteousness come by the law, then
Christ is dead in vain ” (v. 21 ). When it comes to justification, works
and faith are mutually exclusive.
Paul ’s point is clear. The gospel came from the Lord Jesus, and we can never
change it. Those who proclaim it must be continually faithful. Those who pervert
it will be eternally condemned. Those who believe it should be eternally
grateful.